All about electronic valves and hi-fi
If you have a small room and high-efficiency speakers, then keep reading. If not, you can still enjoy reading about probably the best sounding output valve in my view. The 45. I wrote about it few times and have to say, it’s still one of the best. Better than a 300B but unfortunately can do only 2W. You can use it in Push-Pull and is superb. Have a look at this.
ETF.18 has been an emotional journey. I moved house literarily when I got back from ETF so my life has been more than hectic over the past few weeks.
I promise I will do a write-up of this amazing experience. There’s a lot of people out there who would love to attend so is my duty to reflect and share as much as I can.
In the meantime, I wanted to share the lecture I gave at ETF on DHT preamps. It was a challenge on its own but went really well. This was my first ETF and without knowing the audience I had to guess the level of detail, entertainment and expectations of an unknown audience. I knew a fair bit of the ETF folks, but audience was big and wide.
I struggled to find the time to prepare this lecture I have to confess. Between moving house, house building works, my second daughter’s arrival , weekly work travel and everything else, I seemed not to find the time to get this done. Thank you Morgan Jones and Rod Coleman for proof-reading and making this an easier task.
I hope you enjoy it. There are some notes on the slides I put together for the people who didn’t attend ETF. Otherwise the slides aren’t of much use on their own.
I’m writing this blog entry whilst enjoying the lovely Bourbon that Pete Millett gave me on the way back. Thanks Pete!
ETF Lecture on DHT Preamps (with notes):
DHT-Preamps-ETF2018-final-notes
ETF Lecture on DHT Preamps (slides):
Now fitted on the 4P1L PSE stage:
This year I entered the shootout competition and will bring my DHT system to the European Triode Festival in France. It’s comprised of the ER801a stage plus the 01a (if extra gain is needed) and the 4P1L PSE output stage
I will have to swap out the amorphous OPT for the Monolith Magnetic ones as the speaker load is 5R.
It’s going to be interesting!
Browsing my schematic archive I found this early implementation from some years ago on the 300B:
The amp design is straight forward. Let’s start from the output stage. The 300B is run hot at 33W (376V/90mA) with a fixed bias of about -78V. I used a pair of LL1623/90mA OPTs which I had wired on 3K:8 mode.
With a quick mod on one of my active preamps, I managed to implement very quickly the 6Э6П-ДР (6e6p-dr) driver in my system. Here is how the circuit looks like:
I’m a firm believer that if you don’t share, you don’t get back and learn. What the point of not sharing what you’ve learned? I asked myself the question again yesterday, just to push me a bit further. Joys of Easter break is that I have the time to sit down and write. At least for a little bit.
Here is the result of my quest of the years to find the best drivers for a SE amplifier. I’d been looking and experimenting with them in terms of best linearity at large volt swings (I mean large when I say 200Vpp), harmonic profile and most importantly the sound contribution.
Why should you bother? Well if you are in the DHT space (otherwise don’t bother reading further) and, unless you are building a 4P1L amplifier, the majority of the output valves require large volt swing. You also need good headroom. Therefore if the driver is clumsy, it will ruin your expensive project. Again, one of the reasons why people claim that their 300B sound bad. Achieving a driver which can perform 200Vpp effectively with minimal distortion and a decaying harmonic content isn’t a simple task.
In one of my recent post, I blogged an example of the GM70 amplifier. Look at the curves below and the demand to get all of the juice:
Yes, you can load it with a steeper load and use a 6KΩ instead of 10KΩ to get more power, but you still need the same volts to get the full swing.
I tried it (mostly) all over the years. Transformer coupled, choke loaded, resistor loaded. However, in my experience the best is the gyrator load. You may have a different view, and so you may: well, it’s a free world and I’m not expecting you to agree with me. If you are prepared to accept my point for view, then you can continue reading this post 🙂
The hybrid mu-follower (aka gyrator load) is a very effective topology for a driver. You need sufficient volts at the supply, but that’s not generally a problem. You will need at least 25-50V more than the largest voltage swing. Most of the valves I will review below have a good compromise operating point at about 200V. For a 200Vpp or 250Vpp headroom, this means you need 200V+250V/2+50V = 375V. MOSFETs can work at this level and providing you put them the right heatsink size we’re on business!
Initially some years ago I explored the use of LEDs, diodes and particularly SiC diodes to bias the valves. However, I found later that a bit of cathode degeneration by placing and (unbypassed) resistor was a good choice. This linearise the valve a bit and won’t impact the output impedance of the driver. However, if the resistor is within a reasonable value (smaller than 300R I found in practice), the impact on the Frequency Response (FR) is manageable and also the reduction in gain of the stage.
I will present in this post my favourite contenders for the best drivers. These are:
In all cases I found the sweet spot with fixed bias which allows me to dial-in the right operating point in conjunction with the gyrator setting point. Once the best performance was measured (and listened) it was replaced with an equivalent resistor and re-tested. A tedious job, but worth the efforts.
These valves have mostly high gm and gain. You’ve been warned. Don’t even attempt to build with them without special attention on the building aspects. It will oscillate, believe me. You should add grid, anode and screen stoppers. I prefer nice ferrite beads added straight to the socket pins. Continue reading “Driving hard (Part I)”
Here’s an excellent build of the 01a Preamp with the gyrator PCBs and the Source Follower PCBs by Paul. I will leave to him to write down his impressions of this preamp and the build experience.
After trying out so many DHTs and pre-amplifiers, I decided to wire up my 4P1L preamplifier Gen3 and fit the gyrator board to drive my 4P1L PSE Amplifier.
I have a pair of 4P1L/4П1Л dated 1968 which are properly burnt in. I’ve used them lately in my previous preamp incarnation with great results.
The circuit doesn’t need explanation, I think I’ve covered this repeatedly for a long time. I will only point out the differences:
The main change was fitting a pair of Russian wirewound 27Ω resistors in parallel to get closer to the 15Ω used in this position. I found these Russian wirewound resistors to sound extremely well as filament bias resistors. I tend to be skeptical about the “sound” of some components in circuits, however, they do make a big impact in the cathode of a filament bias arrangement.
The gyrator has my preferred combination: IXTP08N100D and BSH111BK. I have now an upgraded PCB Rev07 which fits the BSH111BK and similar FET and I will offer them shortly.
The latter benefits from the 30mA idle current. The result is lower output impedance whilst providing a great frequency response overall.
M3 needs a proper heatsink, it does get hot with about 2W of dissipation.
Well, this valve has the reputation of amazing performance and low distortion. The gyrator setup provides the best out of this valve in my view. You can get a flat response as well as great bandwidht from 10Hz up to 3MHz loaded with 100kΩ:
The distortion is very low and is lower than 0.05% below 10Vrms. Dominant H2 with a lovely harmonic profile characteristic of this valve.
i’ve been listening and using this valve extensively since 2011. I have to say that it sounds amazing. I never get tired of its sounds. Before I listened to a 4P1L-4P1L system and found a slight edge on the sound (probably due to its H3 component) which I don’t hear on my system. The drive, clarity and tone is amazing. It can drive the 4P1L PSE perfectly well and you get a strong and clear bass. Very powerful. My +600 hours 4P1L are very quiet in this setup, no microphonic noise. I don’t have even dampers in the 4P1L sockets!
Anyway, if you need 19dB (x9) gain in your system or you need a driver for your SE amp, then this is the valve to go. I Still can be found cheaply and is a great contender to the thoriated tungsten filament DHTs like 01a and VT-25.
Build this one and enjoy!
The main challenge when implementing valve amplifiers using transmitting valves or valves which require a significant voltage swing (e.g. 300B, 45, etc.) is the driver. Getting the driver right is not easy. You’re asking for a single stage to swing 150 to 200Vpp at minimum distortion. There are some ways you can achieve this:
You should start by reading this extensive blog post. That will provide you with a lot of information around the shunt cascode and how it works. Back in 2013 I started playing with the 6Э5П in this topology. It was quite promising. Now, I have revisited and built this driver to see how it really performed.
The design is very similar to what we discussed back then. I shall proceed in describing the circuit, in particular the changes made. The driver is still the marvellous 6Э5П. There are few valves out there that I don’t like as much as I do with the 6Э5П. I measured the curves long time ago when I started with the curve tracer project. I also tested the 6Э5П and 6Э6П extensively. I do love the 6Э6П as well, it’s one of my favourite drivers.
The 6Э5П is biased at about 200V/30mA with a degeneration cathode resistor of 120Ω. As the gain of this stage isn’t dependent on the μ of the valve, then is good to do this to improve the linearity of the driver. M2 forms a CCS with Rmu. It provides the current to the 6Э5П as well as the current to the common base stage formed by Q1 and Q2. The gain of this stage is gm times R5. The gm is the valve’s transconductance The collector current of the MPSA92 is kept low to ensure distortion is minimised as well as its operated under SOA. D3 provides a protection to the darlington pair when is reversed biased.
The gain of this stage was measured to be x140 (or 43dB). That equals to a degenerated transconductance of 5mA/V with a cathode resistor of 120Ω and a gain resistor for 27kΩ.
