4P1L DHT Preamp Siberian (Gen3) finished!


Building a new version of the venerable 4P1L “Siberian” was very encouraging. This belated project finally came to life after some recent work on a new set of power supplies. So why 4P1L again? I always found the 4P1L sound to be unique. Great detail, overall tone and fantastic treble. What it makes it well suited for pre-amplifiers is not just its linearity (probably being the most linear valve out there) but the fact that it has a low anode resistance and current capability to ensure any challenging load can be handled effectively without any sound degradation. This can be heard particularly on the treble where the input capacitance of the amplifier is more evident and it is translated into treble loss. Other DHTs like 26, 01A, 30sp can only handle a few milliamperes of anode current and is not enough to charge and discharge the  parasitic capacitance at high frequencies. More importantly, the 4P1L has filaments which aren’t demanding. This is a unique feature amongst DHTs that is rare and very useful. Having low-current filaments that can be either configured at 325mA or 650mA, low grid voltages and high transconductance in a valve is very useful. This mean that filament bias can be easily implemented without burning unnecessary power by swinging many volts to perform the desired level of amplification.

However, nothing comes for free. The 4P1L is a dancing lady. You have to tame her singing (i.e. microphonic noise). This may discourage you and has done so to many people before. However, it can be done. Many ways have been discussed out there, but what worked well for me is the use of silent blocks and silicone rubber.  Also starving the filaments is a very effective way of reducing microphonic noise. I parallel the filaments to increase linearity and also to increase the filament current which helps keeping the filament resistor value low which doesn’t impact the output impedance much. Remember that any resistance in the cathode (e.g. the filament bias resistor) is reflected int the anode at (μ+1) times.


4P1Ls can be found in superbly NOS condition (probably not for long) and can be matched very easily. It’s surprising how close they are all to spec or at least amongst other ones in a specific batch.


When I started planning my third 4P1L pre-amplifier, I thought about what I wanted to achieve that I felt could be improved from my previous designs. I came up with the following three things:

  1. Reduce the output impedance: I don’t need further gain, just increased load drive
  2. Increase current drive capability to handle capacitive loads. This is a must if you’re using step-up transformers as an input in your amplifier.
  3. Reduce overall noise level (microphonic and residual hum). After building so many circuits using DHTs, this can be done effectively.

The first two objectives can be accomplished by the use of an LL1660 gapped at 40mA and in Alt Q mode or 4.5:1 step-down. This output transformer will help reducing the output impedance of the 4P1L whilst running the 4P1L at a very high current without compromising the frequency response given the relatively high inductance (i.e. 50H) for the gapped core it has. This feature married with the Ra of the 4P1L will ensure good low-frequency response. The transformer will also help to remove ground loop issues as it provides galvanic isolation between input and output.

The 4P1L likes it hot 🙂 You want to run the 4P1L higher than 20mA if you want to get the most out of this valve. Triode-wired can withstand 9W or even more at 250V maximum anode. As an output stage you can stress the 4P1L to get every juicy bit out of it, but is not what we want in a preamp. We want it to be quiet and very linear. I traced 4P1L in triode mode multiple times throughout the past 3 years and looked at the THD and sound impact of starved filaments in the search of the sweet spot (if there is really only 4P1L Siberian Gen3 Pointone).

I aimed at running the 4P1L around 30-35mA as it was providing the lowest THD on my tests. A good operating point to start here was 163V and -8.7V of bias. I looked at filament bias given it sounds the best to my ears compared to battery or any sort of other fixed bias. I looked at an operating point which will lead me to a nice resistor value that could be formed out of high-quality wirewound resistors and 32mA seemed to be a great choice. The filament resistor then should be Rf=8.7V/(550mA+32mA)= 15Ω. This can be implemented with three 10Ω resistors or if you have a 5Ω at hand then better. The higher power handling capacity the better as it will help keeping the thermal noise down. The quality of this wirewound resistor is fundamental. I use NOS Dale ones. You should pay special attention to this point if you want to get the best sound of this preamplifier.

The 4P1L wired in triode will have a μ=10 and an Ra=1.6kΩ. Transconductance is high at about 6mA/V. Simulation showed that the preamplifier should provide a very low distortion about 0.02%.  Will see how this performs in reality.

The final circuit design is here:
4P1L Siberian Gen3.Nothing new for a classic DHT pre-amp. The devil is in the detail, though. The HT supply is regulated by a Salas SSHV shunt regulator which allows adjustment of the operating point but also is very quiet and proved to be reliable when delivering large currents as well. I used it on my 46 DHT driver with great results. I added a 10μF ANSAR Kelvin capacitor to improve input filtering and HF response. The regulator is set to 210V and 75mA. A 10Ω sensing resistor is added on each anode to help measuring the anode current.

Simulations show that the maximum capacitive load that can be handled by this pre-amplifier is in the region of 18,000pF – 20,000pF before the -3dB point is below 20kHz. This handling capacity should be more than what most of you need in your systems. However this is good enough to drive my step-up input transformer (1:8) and a Zobel network which included a 220k + 390pF.

With the LL1660 wired in 4.5:1 the overall gain is about 6.7dB and output impedance around 425Ω. I ended up wiring the 4P1L with G3 and G2 tied up to the anode via a 300Ω resistor. I usually connected G3 to the cathode filament end which end up with a lower anode current. I therefore ended up with a 34mA anode current.  Not a major difference, but couldn’t be bother to rewire the G3 as I’m fine with a bit more current anyway.

Loctal board with grid resistors

P1 is a stepped attenuator in my case and you can get rid of it if you have a TVC or other volume control. In that case R3 should be changed to something like 100kΩ. I don’t use grid stopper, instead I use a ferrite bead located close to the grid pin. Never had an oscillation problem with the 4P1L so far.

HT Supply (Left) and Filament Supply (Right)

The most critical part of this pre-amplifier is the filament supply. You can’t underinvest here. I designed and built a choke-input filament supply which delivers 16-17V at full load to the Rod Coleman filament regulators. If you haven’t tried proper DC regulation in DHTs, I suggest you read this article. The difference in sound is overwhelming. The slow rise in filament current helps in extending the valve’s filament life.

First tests and listening impressions

It took me half-day to upgrade the 26 preamp and convert it to 4P1L. I had to replace the transformer block (now with cover), the filament regulators, the SSHV2 with a bigger heat-sink, the 4P1L loctal socket board and the filament resistors.

The initial tests on my workbench where really good.  The key highlight measures are:

  1. Bandwidth (-3dB points): 10Hz – +100kHz
  2. Noise level: -87dBV (45μV)
  3. THD: 0.014% @ 1Vrms or 0.0188% @ 2Vrms output

Here are some quick screenshots of my preliminary tests. Load in this case was the Pete Millett’s interface (100kΩ + 250pF or more):

4P1L Siberian Gen3 Freq Response

Sweeping the input to see how much the stage can handle reveals a nice performance. I have to optimise the automated sweep measurement at LF, but either way you can see that up to 8Vrms the THD stays below 0.04% which is really good:

THD 4P1L Siberian Gen3 v1

What is important to highlight is the fact that since this is a DHP in reality and is triode-wired, the H2 and H3 levels are not strictly speaking performing as a pure triode. You get about same levels for large voltage swings. For example at 2Vrms I measured the H2@ -62dB whilst the H3 at -64.8dB.


Sound-wise, I’m surprised with this preamplifier  It’s great.  The microphonic noise is very low, only you can hear it when you tap the valve or when it heats up you will get some metal expansion dings here and there. Once warm (it can get to 105°C measured) it provides the most delicate DHT sound. The dynamics and tone are superb. I can now get some high-treble detail that I lost with my 26 preamplifier. I simply love it. I’m burning in a matched pair of Svetlana NOS 1973 production which my friend Vyacheslav sent me from Ukraine. These are fantastic.


I’m still looking forward to listen this pre-amp for many hours before making further observations. I will also take further measurements when taken back to the workshop.

Now, I will enjoy the 4P1L stage for some time…





22 Replies to “4P1L DHT Preamp Siberian (Gen3) finished!”

  1. Amazing work Ale. I enjoyed every word of your post, as myself is so fond of this valve. I have found same results as you did and could say that 4P1l has unique sound and great potential if used with care. I worry about increasing popularity and future scarcity…,;))

  2. Are you saying you prefer the DALE to the ubiquitous MILLS for the filament? Worry about finding NOS … Any comment about the CADDOCK mp820 or even the MUNDORF Supreme – marketed as a crossover resistor. I find nothing over here like what you recommend. Trying to find a decent substitute. (Still would like to see a schematic of your filament supply) – got my 4P1Ls today – got these from Ukaine faster than the sockets I ordered from a Canadian supplier. Getting my trasnformers wound by the incomparable Dave Slagle. thanks and take care.

  3. Excellent job Ale.
    Please excuse me for this OT.
    Do you know data for LL1660/10mA in 4.5:1 configuration. Lp, Ls, RDCp, RDCs ??

    Thank you,


  4. Amazing work Ale. I Always learn something new from your post.

    can you share why do you use OT instead of Gyrator??


    1. Hi Ferry,
      Thanks for your comments.
      I was looking for lower output impedance rather than gain. I like the sound of an LL1660 and also provides galvanic isolation.
      No reason for not implementing a gyrator here. It works like a charm, but it requires a high quality output capacitor as well.


  5. Dear Ale,
    it’s always a please to read about your installments & findings. This way I learned already quite a lot!
    I startet stocking some 4P1L’s but seem to have difficulties to source the right sockets. Could you (maybe via PM?) give me a hint regarding good quality 4P1L sockets?
    All the best,


  6. Hi there Ale,
    As allways very nicely done and explained.

    You’ve got me thinking and the bug is coming. As you know I have my 26 working well, but it seems simple to adapt it to the 4P1L, in fact I have a pair laying around and also very good Teflon sockets and 2 perfect Dale 15R resitors. I lack the 1660, but can buy pair.

    I also have a pair of unbuilt Rod regulators, my question is if I should build new regulators, or can tweak mine (the existing for the 26’s) and how?

    Thanks for your help.
    Kind regards,

    1. Hi Rui,
      Good to hear from you again.
      4P1L is worth going for. You can get the LL1660 from Big Bear audio in the UK. The filament raw supply shouldn’t be that different from your current implementation. Just sent Rod Coleman an email and he will suggest which resistor you need to change to set the current down to 550mA when probably you have it at around 800-900mA for the 26. You can do this or buy a new pair of regulators, up to you.
      Good luck!

      1. Thanks Ale, nice to here from you to.
        Lets wait for Rod’s reply, anyway I will buy the transformers next week.
        King regards

  7. Hi again Ale,
    Rod told me to change R8 to 3K3 and R1 to 1R5 3W Wirewound, this with 16 to 18VDC.

      1. Hi Ale, nice to ear from you, sorry for the late answer, but I’ve been way the all week in Germany, well I did not tried it because in the mean time I sold the preamp!

        I’ve seen we’ve been busy the last few months with lots of projects.

        I don’t have the time presently to dedicate to these things!

        1. Hi Rui,
          I suppose it was very easy to sell such a wonderful pre-amp build. Hope you can build a new one soon.
          Yes, things are busy for all, but still manage to get some time to work on the projects. So many things to do and such little time!

          1. Hello Ale
            Thanks for passing me on to Rod for the Coleman Regs. I have them in hand and await my valves arrival.
            I’ve been reading Dennis Grimwood’s article;Triode operation with silicon diodes. oestex.com/tubes/triode.htm
            Would you be so kind to try this out and let us know your observations.I ask ’cause your work with 4p1l is so extensive and your lab is so comprehensive.
            Looking forward to your results.

          2. Hi Joe,
            Let us know on your results with the regulators, you won’t be disappointed, in fact you will be amazed with the sound of the DHT stage. Thank you for sharing the link. Unfortunately I’m with very little time these days and have an increasing list of unfinished projects and ideas. I’d try it at some point, but not sure when.

  8. Hello Ale,
    I ask you, politely, to aid the siberian preamplifier that I just finished. I am very satisfied with the sound but the only thing I should solve is the gain too low, compared to my final.
    Can you recommend a solution? An input transformer for example and which model possibly?
    Thank you for your attention,
    Kind regards


    1. Hi Andrea,
      It’s difficult to advise without knowing your system and how much gain you need. I wouldn’t recommend adding an input transformer as is likely to create some stress to your input source (s) with the Miller capacitance reflected in the primary of the step-up transformer. If you seriously need gain I’d recommend exploring the suggestions I provided to your previous comment in the “Siberian Gen3 (4P1L pre-amplifier)” thread. Trying a different connection on the LL1660S (if possible) or an LL1671 instead. Is there any reason why you didn’t look into this?

      1. Hello Ale and I’m sorry, I missed your reply above,
        My final is composed of three stages, a 6sn7 follows a 2a3 valve that pilot a 211.
        Do you think that connect the transformer to achieve higher gain, can I put the 4p1l valve in severe working conditions?
        One last clarification … the difference between the 1660s and a 1660 is only in some links and for the presence of shielding, right?
        What differs the 1660 relation to 1671?
        Will try, however, to follow your advice in the meantime changing links to transforms.
        Sorry for my bad English and for the many questions asked, but this preamplifier is one thing that I really care,
        Thanks again for your help,


        1. Looking at your amp, I’d probably chose a better valve than the 6SN7. Unfortunately swapping it for an 6SL7 would give you plenty of gain, however I don’t think it could swing the volts with minimum distortion.
          If you can change the valve socket, I would modify the first stage and get something like an C3g (triode-strapped) or d3a, 6J52p, E180F, E280F, 6e5P to drive the 2a3 instead of the 6SN7. They will all give you more gain compared to the 6SN7 with exception of the 6e5p. They will all swing lots of volts with minimum distortion, much less than the 6SN7 for sure.

          I think the LL1660S has different winding connections. Check the datasheet, but you could wire it in 4.5:4 as I suggested before. This would be the easiest tweak, providing you can wire the LL1660S in this way. Worst case, check with Lundahl

          Changing the Tx connection (step down ratio) will not affect the 4P1L. The 4P1L can drive lots of volts. When you change the step down (e.g. 4.5:1 to 4.5:4) you are modifying the reflected impedance to the 4P1L and also the voltage gain of the transformer. Only impact is the distortion. Have you looked at the load lines?

          My family is originally from Italy, but I can hardly speak or read it. So we will have to stick to English am afraid!



  9. Good morning Ale, I am very pleased that you have Italian roots.
    I want to thank you for all your advice, I will have the opportunity to experience the directions you gave me and I’ll let you know.
    I wish you a good day,


Comments are closed.