4P1L with 126C OT load stage

Andy Evans built a pre-amp with the 4P1L and was delighted with the sound of it albeit the 4P1L was running below its optimal operating point: 15mA given the limitations of the 126C interstage transformer.

I went to my workshop to test this configuration and looked at biasing 4P1L with fixed bias and driving it with 1Vrms or more to see what the results were:

So here is the first test at Vg=-4V, Va=74V and Ia=15mA

(all tests were done with the 100k input impedance of the Pete Millett Sound Card interface as the secondary load of the OT. 4P1L had both filaments in parallel and If=600mA)

You can see a richer harmonic profile with the OT and distortion is around 0.13% when driven with a 1Vrms providing an expected Vo close to mu (Vo=8Vrms)

The distortion gets very high when output voltage is higher than 9Vrms:

Now if we bias the valve at a more convenient operating point:

We get a slight improvement in THD down to 0.11%. However the distortion above 9Vrms is still high:

So what if we compare the performance of the OT against the CCS?

As we can see from above the distortion is halved. Now if we look at how well this valve could perform if biased in a better operating point, we can see that distortion can be reduce down to 0.03%

4P1L CCS load THD 6 — 4P1L THD 6 (CCS) minimum distortion figure

Minimum distortion from a CCS (or gyrator) doesn’t mean that it will sound better. Clearly the OT doubles the THD of the CCS equivalent circuit. Gain here is nearly same on both as OT is in 1:1. Only way of judging both is to do a listening test….

(which is what I’m planning to do next)

4-65a SE driver

46 DHT in triode mode as a driver

Continuing with the design of the 4-65A SE amplifier based on M. Koster design, I’m in the process of tweaking the 46 driver to optimise the operating point and provide maximum distortion to drive the demanding 4-65a. Here is the circuit I’m currently working on.

The current 46 driver will be biased at around 25-30mA using filament bias, so Vgk will be around -16 to -17.5V using a 10Ω filament bias resistor array. This will set the 46 at around 185-210V which will give sufficient headroom (i.e. need about 200Vpp max) to drive the 4-65a.

So today I look at varying slightly both anode currents and Vgk to see impact on THD.

So minimum THD is around -17V and Ia=30mA. So if setting the Rod Coleman filament regulator to ensure that Vgk=-17V and the anode gyrator to set anode voltage to ensure Ia is close to bias current would provide the minimum distortion (which is 0.04% in this example). Pa is close to 7W, but looking at the datasheet we can see that maximum Pa is 10W (as the latter 45 version).

46 Super Silvertone Ia=30mA — 46 Super Silvertone THD

So next I need to build a prototype of this driver with filament regulator and gyrator load.

45 SE Amplifier upgrade

Replacing driver for 7193 valve

Well, after nearly 12 months of playing relentlessly my 45 SE amplifier, had an unexpected failure in the power supply (passive regulator) which forced me to do maintenance to the amplifier. It was a great opportunity to remove the 6J5 driver and do a quick swap for the greatly respected 7193 (i.e. military version of the 2c22)

45SE Amplifier upgraded with the 7193 drivers

Bias point remains unchanged: 7mA and 260V for maximum swing and minimum distortion. Need to look at my notes, but I remember that I was something around 0.30% at 100Vpp driving the 45 (which is not an easy load for anyone). Driver configuration was not changed, so had the 7193 now loaded with same DN2540 single transistor gyrator and mu-follower output for lower impedance. The valve was biased at about 8V with an LED array.

As a test, played the fantastic Symphony No. 3 from Henryk Gorecki….

Gyrator

A simple PMOS gyrator for driver stage anode load

This is a very simple PMOS based gyrator with only one transistor. You can use a Zetex ZVP0545a which is easy to obtain around here and is not a surface mount type (in case you don’t feel confident in working with SMD components).

Steps to complete the design on this gyrator are as follows:

First you need to ensure you can bias correctly the Mosfet. Knowing your anode quiescent current (Ia) you can set R4 to ensure bias is stabilised as shown in the diagram (point 1)
You then have to ensure you keep the MOSFET Vds at least 25V to 50V to ensure output capacitance is minimised and expected frequency response performance is achieved. Then R1 can be calculated as well knowing your target anode voltage (Va). (point 2)
R2 and R3 will set the anode voltage (Va) which is a design parameter in the gyrator, right?. And also you know the gate voltage (Vg) based on R4 and Vgs (i.e. +B-VR4-Vgs). You can calculate this resistor divider given these two definitions. Also R2 plays with the capacitor to define the rolloff frequency of your gyrator.

CX301a DHT pre-amplifier

CX301a DHT preamp

Here is my latest incarnation of the DHT pre-amplifier:

Many claim that the 26 is the best sounding DHT valve for a pre-amp. I will agree to a certain extent, however I personally found the thoriated-tungsten filament sound a bit more rewarding to my ears. A more clear and defined treble in my opinion.

Since I plugged in my CX301a incarnation of my breadboarded preamp, I just left it there as I loved its sound. Certainly there are things to be improved to enhance the dampening of microphony, albeit I have to confess it hasn’t been a problem to me. Have heard some valves to howl, and this is not one of those. Clearly suspending the valve socket or adding the rubber dampers to the valve holding plate or socket will help massively.

Filament bias is a must in my DHT designs. Since discovered it, can’t avoid not removing most capacitors that I can from the signal path. In this case the filament resistor R9 will increase anode resistance by R9 times (μ+1). This will also impact the stage gain, but here all this is not a problem. You may find this is way too much gain in your system. Rod Coleman’s filament DC regulators are crucial to provide a hum-free stage. Attempting AC or other DC regulator is likely to bring frustration to your design. Believe me, I’ve been there before…

Now turning our attention to the anode load I will not open a debate here (or a can of worms!). You can make your choice of using a superior quality output transformer (and by superior means a lot of money!) or you can look at various options. A choke is a great idea, but special care needs to be taken to ensure choke is not picking up any hum from the remaining parts of the circuit – specially the supply transformers, etc. I have experimented for some time various types of CCS or gyrators as sandy loads for the valves with excellent results. If you are one of those that feels that sand is a sacrilege, then I suggest you stop reading this post now.

Gyrators are superb. They can simulate the AC response of an inductor of 300H (but without storing energy as a real inductor) or above very easily at 1/100 of its cost. You can easily adjust the valve operating point ensuring this is maintained despite the ageing impact of the valve or the eventual replacement of it. The anode voltage will be fixed by the gyrator, the current not. Cascoded MOSFET gyrators provide better supply ripple rejection and isolation. Using Q3 as a CCS instead of a high resistance potentiometer to set the anode voltage is better as it helps providing a better frequency response as impedance on this node is increased. A higher value of R10 will help reducing the size of the gyrator capacitor and the smaller the better it will sound in my experience.

M1 and M2 can be your depletion FET of choice. M1 should be a 250V rated one at least. Depending where you live, you will be inclined for using BSP129, LND150 or DN2540.

Previously I mentioned in some other posts that the mu-follower setup of the gyrator here provides a better output impedance and improves the performance of this valve significantly given its high anode resistance compared to other more suitable DHTs for this purpose such as 4P1L, 46 or 71a.

I’m not going to cover the HT supply here, but using a shunt regulator such as Salas, is one of the best choices here.

With Russian PIO capacitors you will get a fantastic result here, no need to start burning serious money on the capacitors until you are happy with the end to end build and you can then start looking at how to improve the sound of it by replacing some bits with better (or preferred) quality components

With an operating point of Ia=3mA you can get THD=0.08% at Vo=10Vpp. This will be subject of the quality of your CX301a. Some older globe 01a’s have a great sound, but they are not that linear. Hard to pick and chose your precious ladies here without testing them for linearity.

DHT preamp evolution

My 01a DHT preamplifier has performed flawlessly over the last 4 months or so. I do enjoy its warm sound and clear tone. I do prefer it to my 26 OT preamp, despite everyone says the contrary. I personally feel that the thoriated tungsten filament gives some sonic unique mark to the sound here.

I want to do the following test and compare differences in sound:

1) Gyrator load
2) Antitriode load
3) Choke
4) OT

Have my LL1660s which can take out temporarily from the 26 preamp, and also got a couple of chokes to use as well, oil caps, etc?

What do you think?