01a Preamp Gen2

The return of the 01a stage

SX201a in actionI remember my first 01a pre-amplifier to be one of the best sounding ones I ever had. The uniqueness of its tone, detail and clarity was astonishing. Perhaps it is due to the warm tone it provides and I guess this is the reason why Thomas Mayer branded his design as the “sound processor”.  I fell in love with the sound of a CX-301a and the joy of listening to this stage was so great that I found a fantastic excuse now to re-build this stage. My Starlight Discrete DAC has a very low output due to the step down transformer it has. I can only get 500mV as maximum output level. Not enough to drive my system to full level.  This was a perfect argument for me to look at building a simple amplifier stage that could add the sonority of the 01a in my system.

 The concept was very simple. I wanted to maximise gain whilst minimising the number of additional components. The transformer coupling was discarded as a proven design sprang to mind to achieve the maximum gain and reduce size of the preamp.

Firstly, I looked at the curves again when filaments are starved. I found the 01a microphonic noise to be reduced significantly in this condition. I looked at my stock of 01a and selected a pristine globe SX-201a made by Sylvania. This measured really well:

26/10/2014 13:26:39 uTracer3, GUI V3.11.6 Triode Quick Test
SX-201a Silvertone Vf=5V, If=250mA
SECTION 1
 
Test conditions:
Va : 136.7 (V) Swing +/- 2.73 V (2%)
Vg : -9 (V) Swing +/- 0.18 V (2%)
 
Test results:
Ia : 3.09 (mA) 103 % of nominal 3 (mA) 
Ra : 10.7 (kohm) Ra = dVa/dIa
Gm : 803 (uA/V) Gm = dIa/dVg
mu : 9 (-) mu = Gm*Ra

Then, I dialled the filament current down to 200mA:

26/10/2014 13:36:57 uTracer3, GUI V3.11.6 Triode Quick Test
SX-201a Sylvania If=200mA Vf=3.4V
SECTION 1
 
Test conditions:
Va : 136.7 (V) Swing +/- 2.73 V (2%)
Vg : -9 (V) Swing +/- 0.18 V (2%)
 
Test results:
Ia : 2.51 (mA) 84 % of nominal 3 (mA) 
Ra : 14.04 (kohm) Ra = dVa/dIa
Gm : 588 (uA/V) Gm = dIa/dVg
mu : 8 (-) mu = Gm*Ra

As expected the emission was reduced and anode current diminished by 16%. The anode resistance increased from nearly 11KΩ to 14KΩ (+26%) and the transconductance reduced from 800 μmhos to 588 μmhos (-27%). The mu is expected to stay the same however the rounding effect of the uTracer shows a difference however is close to 8.7-8.8.

The saturation of the valve given the low emission is clear when tracing the curves:

SX-201a triode

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The SPICE models can easily be derived from the above set of curves:

SX-201a triode SPICE model (If=250mA) 
SX-201a triode SPICE model (If=200mA) – Starved

 The preamp design

To achieve the additional gain I need on my system, I opted for the classic hybrid mu-follower I used many times before. This topology provides great drive and lower output impedance given its push-pull nature and maximise gain, close to mu. The cascoded FET topology also improves the PSRR. I will tap the HT from the 4P1L line stage I have which gives 235V of raw DC.

01a Preamp Gen2 v2.1

The filament resistor was increased to 20Ω from my previous design given the reduced filament current. I aimed to bias the valve at 3mA for best sound as per my notes:

SX-201a triode starved op point

 

The anode voltage should be 100-104V depending on how the cathode point is derived from the filaments. In practice, the anode current will be adjusted by Rpot part of the high-impedance voltage reference made up by M2 and R3.

This stage has very good HF response given the mu-follower topology and also the low capacitance of the 2SK170 chosen in the lower device instead of a classic DN2540. The low frequency response is given by both C2 + output impedance and C1.

Quality of C1 and C2 is paramount. I’m using Russian PIO NOS I have at hand and sound very nice. You could spend whatever money you want on “boutique” capacitors, which is not my cup of tea. Equally, you want to keep the value of C1 and C2 as low as possible to minimise the impact of these capacitors to the sound of this stage.

Next step is to build this in a breadboard and listen to it!

 

Author: Ale Moglia

"A mistake is always forgivable, rarely excusable and always unacceptable. " (Robert Fripp)

9 thoughts on “01a Preamp Gen2”

  1. Hi Ale, I think also cascoding the LND150s will provide a quieter reference voltage. But dunno whether it will sound any better/different. best, tim

    1. Hi Tim,
      Yes, only marginal 4dB. From 100dB to 104dB @ 100Hz. Slightly better at HF, but I suspect is not worth the extra complexity. I could try though!
      Thanks for the suggestion
      Ale

      1. Hi Ale,
        I’m the first to admit that I know bugger all about electronics, but there might be a couple of other benefits to cascoding the LND150s.
        First is minimising the bypass leakage of the bias supply in parallel with the main CCS/Gyrator.
        Seconds is thermal isolation. A single LND150 programme current with the power dissipated as the applied voltage changes. A cascode of LND150s does not show voltage dependent current changes.
        I’ve no idea how important these are in your arrangement or if they will have any effect on the sound. Might be just slightly better engineering.
        Grist for the mill maybe.
        best tim

        1. Hi Tim,
          Good point, I haven’t thought about that. The LND150 CCS dependency with temperature is an issue. I investigated this on my 814SE DC-coupled and the temperature variance of the FET impacts the bias point of the output stage due to the nature of the design.
          In this case a small variance of the operating point won’t have an impact on the preamp. However, when I simulated the difference in LTSpice, I was surprised with the results. The single FET variance on the operating point is 631mV when temperature is increased from 20C to 40C. In the cascoded version the variance is slightly bigger 646mV! What could be playing here?
          Cheers
          Ale

  2. Hello Ale,

    very nice blog 🙂
    I regularly pay you a visit.

    Using a 01A preamplifier myself I was wondering which tubes are those nice glowing ones on the picture up on the page.

    Thank you very much in advance.

    Best regards,
    Martin

    1. Hi Martin
      I can’t remember and need to dig the tubes out. I think they were old Sylvania SX-201a. I have 2 pairs and they sound beautifully. I will be finishing the preamp in some weeks so will look for them again
      thanks
      Ale

  3. Do you recommend this preamp for the systems where not much gain is needed? What is the minimum gain possible to reduce in this preamp without affecting the soundquality?

  4. Dear Ale,

    Thanks for your great work on DHT preamps!
    Would like to ask if all 01a tubes are interchangable (eg UX/UV/CX, and 201a and 301a)
    and which 01a is your favourite? 🙂

    Thanks
    Regards
    Ben

    1. Hi Ben,
      Thank you for your feedback. Yes, if they are all 01a they are interchangeable. There are some good articles out there explaining the different versions of the valve. For me the most important thing to look for, is the state of the valve regardless of the type/brand. These are so old devices so you’re most likely to get hold of a device that could be damaged or worn out. Some electrodes could have move due to mechanical stress and produce unwanted distortion and behaviour of the valve. If you can get access to a valve tracer, can save you a lot of effort in finding a pair of valves which are suitable for your preamp.
      For me, the globe valves (if in pristine condition) sound slightly better than the ST bottle ones. RCA Cuningham, Sylvertone and Sylvania are my preferred ones. See what you can find.
      Needless to say, there are “so” many other aspects of the preamp to look for first in order to achieve the best sound.
      Hope this helps.
      Ale

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.