813 triode SE with 4P1L Pentode

A monster DHT amp

Lately I haven’t had any time for audio work unfortunately. Changing nappies to a 4 week old baby whilst working long hours is tough. I can get the odd 30 minute here and there and every time I try to get upstairs to the workshop something pops up. Never mind, hopefully things will get easier in the near future.

I’ve been asked about the 4P1L pentode driver. It’s been a long time since I did those tests and never got around to listen to the driver sound. Tests were promising but never managed to include this driver on my amp.

Driving transmitting valves is a challenging task. Especially if we want to take them to A2-land (unless they operate in A2 whilst in zero grid bias). Driving big transmitting valves like 211, 805, 845, 813 or GM-70 require a large swing of volts for the driver which should do this linearly. The load is quite demanding in particular when we approach the grid to 0V (or biased positively) and using a triode as driver also puts a daunting task to the previous stage due to the Miller effect. It’s not easy to find triodes that can swing 300Vpp with very low distortion.

Continue reading “813 triode SE with 4P1L Pentode”

PL84 triode

TV-Roehre-PL84-Telefunken-m--Raute-ID1497-1497

The PL84 pentode is very well known out there. I’m not going to write about it as there is plenty of information about the use of this pentode in push-pull amps, etc as well as comparisons with the EL84, EL86 and Russian equivalents such as 6P14P, 6P15P and 6P43P. I recommend you to check Klau’s work here.

I have a nice set of Telefunken PL84 which I may be using in triode mode as part of a Spud project I’ve been working on the design for some time. I’m interested in triode-strapped curves but also will be looking at tracing the Schade-feedback curves when I get the time to do so.

I quickly found a sample valve that was close to the pentode specs at 90%. Good enough for my purpose so I proceed to trace the triode curves quickly in uTracer.

Continue reading “PL84 triode”

When protection fails

“Don’t Stop Til you Burn Enough!”

IMG_0436.JPG

Merry Christmas to you all! Christmas Eve ended up with some smoke and the party was over a bit early. We played music really loud last night and got carried away with some dancing around whilst playing “Don’t stop til you get enough” from Michael Jackson. And literally, the 814 SE didn’t get enough!

Let me explain briefly what happened. The 814 output stage has a crowbar protection circuit. It is configured to trigger around 200mA. The crowbar works brilliantly well, however, what is tricky on my design is the fact that you do get proper grid current in A2 operation. This grid current adds to the cathode current and flows through the crowbar sensing resistor. Well, volume was so loud so am sure that when the drum or bass kicked in, the crowbar was triggered. Interestingly enough, the shunt resistor is a 330Ω / 50W piece which should (in theory) blow the 500mA fast fuse. Well, it didn’t.  The current peak wasn’t big enough before the output voltage of the 600V supply dropped significantly. Bear in mind that 330Ω should take serious current out of a 600V supply in theory!

The result was evident in a couple of seconds. The shunt resistor went madly hot, burned the plastic stand-off isolator quickly and fell over one of the current meters and burned the plastic cover badly as you can see on the image above. Luckily only one channel crowbar got activated.

When I rushed into the 600V supply mains switch I saw the secondary pair of dampening resistors (100Ω 7W wire-wound) melting and red hot. They were acting as a fuse and obviously preventing the supply to deliver further current.

Of course, the 814 was intact as it was the OT. At least the crowbar did it job, but far too early 🙂

Fixed it this morning after doing the Christmas present stuff. I couldn’t end up without music in Christmas!

Lesson learned here. Crowbar needs proper testing! I will buy smaller fuses – probably a pair of 200mA slow burn will work fine next time.

Happy Christmas!

Merry Christmas!

20121220-202553.jpg

It is so great to have another Christmas. It gives us an opportunity to wind down and spend proper time with our loves ones. The ones who are physically with us, and remember the ones who are no longer here, but still very present in our memories.

In fact, we all look forward to the holiday period to crack on with our projects. We all have a pile of endless projects and ideas and no better time than Christmas to start working on them.

Continue reading “Merry Christmas!”

814 SE Amplifier: Custom Output Transformers

 Improving the 814 SE Amplifier

photo 3After more than a year listening to this fantastic amplifier, it was time to do the first significant improvement to it despite I resisted to modify it after so much work and effort put into the design and build. The evident upgrade was the output transformer. When frequency response was measured, it was evident to see that the HF response was lower than expected. This is the result of the transformer and its configuration in this circuit. The LL9202 is a better OT for higher impedances and in this circuit, it is used in the 6KΩ /8Ω mode.

Continue reading “814 SE Amplifier: Custom Output Transformers”

Robustiano (V0.7)

Hacked a simple PCB to build the follower to drive the 4P1L as suggested by Rod. I had to play with the LND150 setting resistor (R4) to achieve the 2mA of idle current. I ended up biasing the 4P1L rather hot at about 11.5W which exceeds the specs. The Q2 VBE was not possible to measure as the Q2 would oscillate I guess when I place the tester lead on Q1 collector and the voltage seems to drop when I try to measure it. Should have added a ferrite bead:

Robustiano v07 bench test

When measuring distortion against frequency, I was keen to see that the follower provided some impact in reducing the HF distortion. For example at 20kHz, THD reduced from 0.96% to 0.59% @1W output power and from 7.84% to  3.52%, that is close to half the distortion I had before:

Robustiano v07 THD tests

What is nice to see now is the effect of the follower providing sufficient source current to the 4P1L grid. Above 2.5W, the grid current kicks in and we can see how “Robustiano” can deliver 3W at less than 1% until starts to clip about 3.5W:

Robustiano v07 THD versus power

I found that if I were to reduce the Rf further and therefore increasing the collector current but obviously exceeding the 4P1L power dissipation too much as collector current was about 45-48mA, the distortion at 20kHz falls significantly. I suspect I should increase the collector current to enable better drive of Q2 due to its Cib (30pF). To keep the current feedback arrangement this could be done by reducing the negative emitter voltage source (V1). Should try this I guess…

20140726-093332-34412311.jpg

 

Cheers

Ale

Robustiano (Version 0.4)

Finally back home after a long trip and had the opportunity to put the DN2540 at test and try the topologies discussed for the “Schade” feedback 4P1L SE amplifier. So I re-build my test rig and tried the DN2540 and LND150 at various drain currents. It was clearly to see that in order to keep distortion to a minimum, the VDS needs to be greater than 60V to keep the output capacitance of the FET low. Here are the results of the frequency response at nearly maximum output power (Po=2W):

Robustiano 4P1L VER 0.4 DRIVER TESTSIt is interesting to see that the LND150 which has Coss (max) of 3.5pF doesn’t perform much better than the DN2540 which has Coss (max) of about 30pF. Operating points are different for both FETs but the 4P1L is running about the same operating conditions. What is also interesting to verify with this test is that the higher the drain current, the more capability the FET has to drive the 4P1L input (and Coss) capacitance at higher frequencies as the slew rate of the FET is higher.

ROBUSTIANO 4P1L VER04 THD VS POWER

We can see an interesting improvement from my initial tests at 5mA when drain current was just about 1.5mA. The yellow trace (Id=5mA) shows the best performance of the DN2540. Surely higher drain current will perform better but at a cost as the drain current is part of the OT primary current.

So how do we keep the gain of the FET when increasing the drain current? The natural approach will be to reduce Rf, but this affects the FET gain and the feedback. The alternative is to increase the supply voltage respect to ground. The price we pay here is to increase the cathode resistor and burning the power on it. With -4V as the negative source supply voltage, I had to only reduce RF to 51.5K to set 5mA on the DN2540. The supply power was increased to 350V, the screen (Vg2k) to about 140V (240-98.6V) which is lower than the 150V used before. There is a tad of extra power to extract on the 4P1L but here is close to its maximum dissipation. The Rk is a pair of wirewound 4K7 in parallel.

Robustiano 4P1L SE Schade v01.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think it is now time to try the BJT driver. I suspect that it will need at least 5mA of collector current to get on with the task of the input capacitance of the 4P1L when anode to grid feedback is in place.

cheers

Ale

 

 

814 SE Amplifier: measurements

It was time to take the 814 SE Class A2 amplifier measurements. The challenge though, is that the amp is so heavy that I will never take it up to the workshop. Therefore, I decided to take my workshop PC down from the loft this time to see how the 814 really responded.

First test was to do a THD analysis as a function of the total output power. As you don’t want to do this with your speakers, and also the classic wire wound resistors (Alu-clad) are inductive, you want to use non-inductive resistors like this test jig:

20140422-125905.jpg I bolted on to a large heat-sink an array of resistors to form 8Ω in value by using a pair of 10Ω in parallel and three 1Ω in series.  I added a set of binding posts and connectors for the speaker cables. this way you can easily wire your speakers and connect your audio test set to take the measurements.

 

 

 

 

Continue reading “814 SE Amplifier: measurements”

814 SE A2 Amplifier

Goodbye 4-65a SE, at least for now

IMG_1401After enjoying the 4-65a SE amplifier for many months, I couldn’t resist myself from upgrading the output stage to the 814s.  I just needed changing sockets and filament raw supply transformers to fit the requirements of this lovely transmitting valve. Needless to say, my recent tests on 814s were very encouraging. The 814 seemed to perform much better than the 4-65a in delivering 10W of class A2 sound at half the distortion levels. This to me, was only worth trying.

Continue reading “814 SE A2 Amplifier”

814 SE A2 Amplifier (Part 1)

20131117-133216.jpg
816 in triode mode

It’s time for the leap of faith. Having tested the 814 in triode mode, I will proceed now to upgrade my 4-65a SE amplifier and replace output valve for the 814. To ensure it can withstand the 540V in the anode, the remaining grids are all tied together through a resistor to the anode. All grids and anode are fitted with ferrite beads as well. A pair of UF4007 in series are placed to protect the Output Transformer in case load is accidentally disconnected.

20131117-133236.jpg
UX5 socket prepared

I added to the UX-5 socket a small bar to place two turrets to provide the anode (top connector), the strapped grid connections through the wire-wound resistor and the pair of UF4007 diodes.

Given that the 814 will run @ 540V / 100mA, I will only need to adjust the Rod Coleman regulators to set current down to 3.25A after replacing the raw filament transformers, as the 814 are 10V instead of 6V filaments of the 4-65a.

Minor DC adjustment will be required on the driver circuit via the gyrator load, so can easily implement this new amplifier.

Stay tuned…

20131117-133251.jpg
814 ready to go